As students of history, could we agree that all empires upon the earth have been organizations of terrorism?
Could we also agree that all emperors of all empires have sought to do the will of their god, or to be pleasing to their gods and goddesses?
Could we further agree that all empires have been political-religious systems? That the objective of all empires have been the same objective: to control and dominate the lives of as many people as possible, to bring people under the authority of the emperor, as well as to convert all of their captives to slavery as well as to convert captives to their religions?
At the tower of Babel in ancient Babylon, Nimrod was the emperor of his empire, and he was the head of its politics and its religion. Nimrod was a man to be feared.
Just as the religious system of ancient Babylon has spread across the earth, so has the political system of ancient Babylon spread across the earth in the form of empires.
So then, just as the religion of ancient Babylon has been the blueprint of religions all over the earth, so has Nimrod's example been a blueprint that other men would follow as emperors of empires.
Nimrod was a god-man to the ancient Babylonians, and all emperors are considered to be god-men in their empires upon the earth.
Knowing this (that empires are organizations of terrorism), what do you suppose the Holy Roman Empire was all about?
The people of Rome considered the pope to be a god-man (just like Nimrod) which means that all of the popes, for hundreds of years, were emperors, as the Holy Roman Empire sought to control and dominate the lives of people, the enslave people under Roman's religious dome, and to rid the world of all infidels with murders en masse. In total, the Holy Roman Empire was from the blueprint of Nimrod's dictatorship in ancient Babylon---and so was Rome's religious blueprint from Nimrod's empire.
Knowing this, then we should also be able to agree that the Holy Roman Empire was an organization of terrorism.
But! Was there anything holy about the Holy Roman Empire? Would a holy pope actually order the executions of innocent people?
The deception of Nimrod still flows through Rome today, as it also flows through the minds of millions of people upon the earth: that the pope is a god-man, for people continue to bow to him and kiss his ring.
Why is it so difficult for religious people to believe that men of religion are dirty rotten scoundrels? For it was men of religion who killed Jesus, and it was men of religious Rome that killed millions of Christians during the era of the Holy Roman Empire.
As students of history, do we not search for historical facts instead of historical fiction? Or has the search for truth become historical friction?
Or, is there something about truth that causes people to fear?
Fear not: for, behold, I bring you good tidings of great joy, which shall be to all people. For unto you is born this day in the city of David a Saviour, which is Christ the Lord. (Luke 2: 10, 11)
www.bible.com
Could we also agree that all emperors of all empires have sought to do the will of their god, or to be pleasing to their gods and goddesses?
Could we further agree that all empires have been political-religious systems? That the objective of all empires have been the same objective: to control and dominate the lives of as many people as possible, to bring people under the authority of the emperor, as well as to convert all of their captives to slavery as well as to convert captives to their religions?
At the tower of Babel in ancient Babylon, Nimrod was the emperor of his empire, and he was the head of its politics and its religion. Nimrod was a man to be feared.
Just as the religious system of ancient Babylon has spread across the earth, so has the political system of ancient Babylon spread across the earth in the form of empires.
So then, just as the religion of ancient Babylon has been the blueprint of religions all over the earth, so has Nimrod's example been a blueprint that other men would follow as emperors of empires.
Nimrod was a god-man to the ancient Babylonians, and all emperors are considered to be god-men in their empires upon the earth.
Knowing this (that empires are organizations of terrorism), what do you suppose the Holy Roman Empire was all about?
The people of Rome considered the pope to be a god-man (just like Nimrod) which means that all of the popes, for hundreds of years, were emperors, as the Holy Roman Empire sought to control and dominate the lives of people, the enslave people under Roman's religious dome, and to rid the world of all infidels with murders en masse. In total, the Holy Roman Empire was from the blueprint of Nimrod's dictatorship in ancient Babylon---and so was Rome's religious blueprint from Nimrod's empire.
Knowing this, then we should also be able to agree that the Holy Roman Empire was an organization of terrorism.
But! Was there anything holy about the Holy Roman Empire? Would a holy pope actually order the executions of innocent people?
The deception of Nimrod still flows through Rome today, as it also flows through the minds of millions of people upon the earth: that the pope is a god-man, for people continue to bow to him and kiss his ring.
Why is it so difficult for religious people to believe that men of religion are dirty rotten scoundrels? For it was men of religion who killed Jesus, and it was men of religious Rome that killed millions of Christians during the era of the Holy Roman Empire.
As students of history, do we not search for historical facts instead of historical fiction? Or has the search for truth become historical friction?
Or, is there something about truth that causes people to fear?
Fear not: for, behold, I bring you good tidings of great joy, which shall be to all people. For unto you is born this day in the city of David a Saviour, which is Christ the Lord. (Luke 2: 10, 11)
www.bible.com
No comments:
Post a Comment
Your comments will not be published openly.